Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes N/A — deploying
[codeowner-coordinator#90](https://github.com/zed-industries/codeowner-coordinator/pull/90)
to zed repo.
## Summary
Pass `ASSIGN_INTERNAL` and `ASSIGN_EXTERNAL` repository variables to the
assign-reviewers workflow. The coordinator script now uses these to
control whether an individual PR assignee is set based on the author's
org membership.
**Defaults:** org members skip assignee (teams self-organize
accountability), external contributors get an assignee (identifies who
should shepherd the PR). Both are togglable from repo Settings →
Variables without code changes.
Side benefit: skips the 30-55 second `poll_for_reviewers` polling loop
for org-member PRs.
## Post-merge manual step
Set repository variables (Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions →
Variables):
- `ASSIGN_INTERNAL` = `false`
- `ASSIGN_EXTERNAL` = `true`
Release Notes:
- N/A
These are noisy, and in general I'd prefer people to focus on the
quality of the resulting system; not the size of the diff. (Which may
require deliberately making changes larger)
## Context
<!-- What does this PR do, and why? How is it expected to impact users?
Not just what changed, but what motivated it and why this approach.
Link to Linear issue (e.g., ENG-123) or GitHub issue (e.g., Closes#456)
if one exists — helps with traceability. -->
## How to Review
<!-- Help reviewers focus their attention:
- For small PRs: note what to focus on (e.g., "error handling in
foo.rs")
- For large PRs (>400 LOC): provide a guided tour — numbered list of
files/commits to read in order. (The `large-pr` label is applied
automatically.)
- See the review process guidelines for comment conventions -->
## Self-Review Checklist
<!-- Check before requesting review: -->
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
I appreciate its efforts and it helps me a lot, but I do not think
thanking zed-zippy in Discord is the right move to acknowledge its work.
Release Notes:
- N/A
The workflow run at
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23557683707 succeeded
but threw some warnings for a rather-soon Node.js 20 deprecation (June
2nd).
Hence, this PR updates in that context mentioned workflows to newer
versions from which on the actions will use Node.js 24.
Namely, this updates
- `actions/checkout`
- `actions/create-github-app-token` and
- `peter-evans/create-pull-request`
to their latest version which includes said updates. As for their most
recent versions, all of these actions just updated their versions to
account for said deprecation.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR bumps the extension CLI version used in the extension workflows
to `1fa7f1a3ec28ea1eae6db2e937d7a538fb10c0c7`.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: zed-zippy[bot] <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
As of https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/50750, the runner size
for building the extension CLI is no longer sufficient due to the
addition of the `settings_content` crate as a dependency. The [most
recent workflow
run](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23554506504/job/68577404831)
fails while building that crate due to insufficient RAM availlable
during the build.
Removing the dependency is not an option, as we do want to have the
validation here and need structs from the settings content crate to do
so.
Thus, changing the job here to a larger runner to fix the build and also
build it faster.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
Fork PRs receive a read-only `GITHUB_TOKEN`, causing 403 errors on all
label and comment writes
([example](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/51878)). This
splits the single workflow into two:
- **pr-size-check.yml** (`pull_request`): computes size and guided tour
detection, uploads a JSON artifact — read-only, works for forks
- **pr-size-label.yml** (`workflow_run`): downloads the artifact,
applies labels and comments — runs on the base repo with full write
access
### Security
- Artifact treated as untrusted data: fields are cast and validated
(`Number()`, `String()` + prefix check, `Boolean()`) before use
- No artifact content is executed or interpolated into shell
- Missing artifact handled gracefully (steps skip via output flag)
### Also included
- Structural guided tour detection: extracts "How to Review" section,
strips HTML comment placeholders, checks for actual author content
(fixes false positive in #51957)
- Softer confirmation: "appears to include guidance"
Tested locally end-to-end against 4 real PRs
(XL/small/medium/false-positive).
## How to Review
1. `pr-size-check.yml` — the compute half. Compare against the previous
version: all write operations removed, artifact upload added at the end.
2. `pr-size-label.yml` — new file. Download artifact, validate, apply
labels/comments. Same label logic as before, just in a `workflow_run`
context.
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
Follow-up to #51964. The previous fix (stripping HTML comments) still
had a false positive: the `## How to Review` heading itself matched the
`how to review` alternative in the regex. Every PR using the template
would trigger the "guided tour detected" message.
Replace the regex with structural detection: extract the "How to Review"
section, strip template placeholders, and check if the author actually
wrote content there. Also softens the confirmation message to "appears
to include guidance."
## How to Review
- Single file: `.github/workflows/pr-size-check.yml`, lines 147-154
- The `rawBody.match(...)` extracts content between `## How to Review`
and the next `##` heading
- Confirmed: PR #51957's body returns `false`, a PR with actual content
returns `true`
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
The size check workflow's guided tour detection matches text inside HTML
comment placeholders in the PR template (e.g., `<!-- provide a guided
tour — numbered list of files/commits to read in order -->`), producing
false positives like the one on #51957.
Fix: strip `<!-- -->` comments from the PR body before running the
regex.
## How to Review
- Single file: `.github/workflows/pr-size-check.yml`, lines 148-151
- The `.replace(/<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '')` runs in `actions/github-script`
JS, not shell
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
Cleanup of the one-off workflow added in #51958. Both affected PRs
(#51897, #50372) now have passing checks and correct size labels.
## How to Review
- Single file deletion: `.github/workflows/fix-size-check.yml`
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
The permissions ceiling bug (fixed in #51948) left two open PRs (#51897,
#50372) with failed `check-size` runs. The Check Runs API requires
GitHub App auth, so we can't post passing checks from the CLI — it needs
to run inside Actions with `checks: write`.
This adds a `workflow_dispatch` workflow that takes comma-separated PR
numbers, computes sizes, applies labels, and posts passing check runs.
Delete after use.
## How to Review
- Single file: `.github/workflows/fix-size-check.yml`
- Uses the same size logic and ignored patterns as `pr-size-check.yml`
- Input is `pr_numbers` (comma-separated integers), accessed via JS API,
not shell interpolation
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Context
The PR size check workflow has been failing with `403 Resource not
accessible by integration` on every run
([example](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23281894554/job/67698634490)).
The root cause is a workflow-level `permissions` block that set a
read-only ceiling, silently preventing the job-level `issues: write` and
`pull-requests: write` grants from taking effect.
This also adds an idempotency improvement: when a new push doesn't
change the PR's size bracket, the workflow now skips the label
remove/re-add cycle, eliminating unnecessary timeline noise.
## How to Review
- Focus on `.github/workflows/pr-size-check.yml` — that's the only file
changed
- Lines 17-23: workflow-level `permissions` block removed, job-level
retained
- Lines 81-112: new `alreadyCorrect` check wraps the label mutation
block
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
Fix failing `assign-reviewers` workflow — pip's `--hash` syntax only
works in requirements files (`-r`), not constraint files (`-c`). The `-c
/dev/stdin` approach caused: `hashes are missing from some
requirements`.
Failing run:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23272148116/job/67667106308
Coordinator PR:
https://github.com/zed-industries/codeowner-coordinator/pull/84
## Test plan
- [x] Verified locally: good hash installs cleanly, bad hash rejected
- [ ] After merge: verify assign-reviewers workflow passes on next PR
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
- The Pulls API with `state=closed` paginates through all closed PRs in
the repo. On a repo as active as Zed, this exceeds the 5-minute job
limit ([failed
run](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/23271617583)).
- Switch to the Search API which supports `merged:>DATE` natively, so
GitHub filters server-side and returns only matching hotfix PRs.
- Tested against the Zed repo — query completes in seconds.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
Deploy updated `assign-reviewers.yml` from
[codeowner-coordinator#83](https://github.com/zed-industries/codeowner-coordinator/pull/83):
- Switch trigger from `pull_request` to `pull_request_target` to support
fork PRs and fix `author_association` misclassification bug (org members
reported as `COLLABORATOR`)
- Remove `author_association` filter and fork gate — reviewer
assignments are inherently scoped to org team members by the GitHub
Teams API
- Remove `--min-association member` from script invocation
- Add `SECURITY INVARIANTS` comment block documenting
`pull_request_target` safety requirements
- Add concurrency guard to prevent duplicate runs per PR
- Add `--require-hashes` + SHA256 pin for pyyaml install
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify a fork PR triggers the workflow and receives team
assignment
- [ ] Verify a draft→ready PR triggers correctly
- [ ] Verify org member PRs continue to work
Release Notes:
- N/A
This switches the action back to the upstream one where the changes were
merged (thanks @\huacnlee for the quick action)
Aside from that, it does some minor fixes: It adds the bumper as an
assignee on the extensions PR and also ensures we do not try to bump
here in the repo for the test extensions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR bumps the update action again. It also fixes a bug where a cache
issue could occur during the extension auto bump and adds update
auto-merge for PRs from staff-members in zed-industries/extensions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#51339
This should address issues with too new libstdc++.so on older/more
conservative distros such as RHEL9.
Release Notes:
- Relaxed requirement for libstdc++.so available on Linux distros.
This will allow us to also use the workflows for this repository, which
will especially come in handy once we revisit provider extensions.
Not perfect, as we will trigger some failed workflows for extensions
that were just added
Release Notes:
- N/A
This wil help with releases for extensions living this repository, which
will become more relevant once agent provider extensions are back on the
table.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This will allow us to test changes against just a subset of extensions.
Another advantage is that extension workflows will be pinned, which
allows for easier debugging and better predictability.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR takes a different approach to permissions for
assign-reviewers.yml and better filters external PRs for now.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- ~~[ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- ~~[ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This pull request adds a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate
reviewer assignment for pull requests. The workflow leverages the
`codeowner-coordinator` repository to intelligently assign the most
relevant teams as reviewers based on the changes in the PR. This should
streamline the review process and ensure the right teams are notified.
**Automated Reviewer Assignment Workflow:**
* Introduced `.github/workflows/assign-reviewers.yml`, a workflow that
triggers on PR open and ready-for-review events to assign 1-2 relevant
teams as reviewers using a script from the
`zed-industries/codeowner-coordinator` repository.
* The workflow checks out the coordinator repo, sets up Python, installs
dependencies, and runs the assignment script with the necessary
environment variables.
* Reviewer assignment is only performed for PRs originating from within
the organization for now.
* The output of the reviewer assignment step is maintained as an Actions
artifact for later inspection or debugging.
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] ~~Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] ~~Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has been deprecated in favor of Gemini 3.1 Pro.
This removes the `Gemini3Pro` variant from the `Model` enum and all
associated match arms, updates eval model lists, docs, and test
fixtures.
A serde alias (`"gemini-3-pro-preview"`) is kept on `Gemini31Pro` so
existing user settings gracefully migrate to the replacement model.
Closes AI-66
Release Notes:
- Removed deprecated Gemini 3 Pro Preview model; existing configurations
automatically migrate to Gemini 3.1 Pro.
Adds a consent banner, similar to the one on zed.dev
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Follow-up to https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/50138
I deliberately decided against adding this in a separete job because
ts_query_ls is very fast when it comes to both formatting these as well
as checking for proper formatting. Will see here how long it takes to
install and whether we might need to adjust to account for the
installation time.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Implements a basic web platform for the wasm32-unknown-unknown target
for gpui
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: John Tur <john-tur@outlook.com>
GitHub 4 me 0 - after testing for x times in a local and even the remote
setup provided by Namespace during an action, this now adds a dedicated
step to debug the failure we are seeing in extension tests to finally
resolve said issue.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Disable the cron schedule for the background agent MVP workflow. Manual
runs via workflow_dispatch are still available.
The workflow was running daily on weekdays but the project is being
paused. This change:
- Comments out the schedule trigger
- Adds a note pointing to the Notion doc for context
- Preserves the ability to run manually
See [Background Agent for
Zed](https://www.notion.so/Background-Agent-for-Zed-3038aa087eb980449b9ee02f70ae8413)
Notion doc for current status and contacts to resume this work.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Cleans up a new GitHub Actions workflow.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- ~~[ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing~~
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- ~~[ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)~~
Release Notes:
- N/A
Lost another battle to the GitHub docs. Instead, now let's just do it
ourselves here in bash and not guess whatever GitHub is referring to in
their documentation..
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
Fork PRs don't have access to repository secrets (`FACTORY_API_KEY`),
causing the docs suggestions workflow to fail when triggered by external
contributor PRs.
This adds a condition to skip the `batch-suggestions` job when the PR
originates from a fork (`github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name
!= github.repository`).
## Context
See failing job:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/22323201362/job/64586740764
The `pull_request` trigger doesn't pass secrets to workflows running on
fork PRs for security reasons. This is expected GitHub behavior.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Gives the compilation in a repository with a few more grammars some more
time to run. Also adds the Rust cache which might be utilized here
during Rust compilation.
Release Notes:
- N/A
More precisely, the name of the GitHub project board in question is
“Closed bugs with new comments”, and since GitHub seems to do the
closing and the commenting separately (and, crucially for this
automation, in that order) when the closer uses the “Close with comment”
functionality, we want to skip the comments added within 30 seconds
after the closing.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Add a script that classifies open and closed issues that the duplicate
bot commented (or not commented) on and puts them into the appropriate
columns of the dedicated github project board. Add a workflow that calls
that script for every closed issue and also on a schedule (that's for
the open ones).
If you're reading this some time way later and there's no bot running
around the repository leaving comments like “This issue appears to be a
duplicate of...”, you can delete these files.
Release Notes:
- N/A
The failure in #49661 was caused by a broken pipe, which then led to
tests not being ran.
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <marshall@zed.dev>
## Summary
Fixes the `SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier 'gemini'` error in the
cherry-pick documentation suggestions workflow.
## Problem
The 'Post suggestions as PR comment' step was directly interpolating
markdown content into a JavaScript template literal:
```javascript
const suggestions = `${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suggestions }}`;
```
When the suggestions contained backticks, `${}` sequences, or other
special characters (like the `gemini-3.1-pro-preview` model name in
markdown code blocks), it broke the JavaScript syntax.
## Solution
Write suggestions to a file in `$RUNNER_TEMP` and read it using
`fs.readFileSync()` in the script step. This avoids all GitHub Actions
template interpolation and JavaScript string parsing issues.
## Testing
This should fix the failed run:
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/22194396124/job/64190762087
Release Notes:
- N/A
Add exponential backoff retry logic (3 attempts with 5s/10s/15s delays)
to the Droid CLI installation and
docs-suggest script execution steps in both the batch-suggestions and
cherry-pick-suggestions jobs.
This handles intermittent Factory API authentication issues that can
cause workflow failures when the API is temporarily unavailable or
rate-limited.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Fixes the workflow failure where `gh auth login --with-token` fails
because `GH_TOKEN` is already set in the environment.
The error was:
```
The value of the GH_TOKEN environment variable is being used for authentication.
To have GitHub CLI store credentials instead, first clear the value from the environment.
```
The fix uses a subshell to unset `GH_TOKEN` before calling `gh auth
login`:
```bash
echo "$GH_TOKEN" | (unset GH_TOKEN && gh auth login --with-token)
```
Release Notes:
- N/A
Fix git auth conflict in background_agent_mvp workflow
The workflow was manually configuring git authentication with:
```bash
git config --local http.https://github.com/.extraheader "AUTHORIZATION: bearer ..."
```
This conflicted with the authentication already set up by
`actions/checkout@v4`, which uses `AUTHORIZATION: basic ...`.
The conflict caused all crash pipeline runs to fail with:
```
fatal: could not read Username for 'https://github.com'
```
This morning's run (22147984206) failed for all 15 crash candidates
(ZED-4VS, ZED-202, etc.) with this error.
Remove the redundant git config since actions/checkout already handles
authentication properly.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Fixes two issues in the documentation suggestions workflow:
1. **Shell quoting bug**: PR titles containing quotes (e.g., `agent_ui:
Add the ability to undo "reject all"`) were breaking the shell script
because the title was substituted directly into the script. Moved
`PR_TITLE`, `PR_NUM`, and `OUTPUT_FILE` to environment variables where
special characters are handled safely.
2. **GH CLI auth issue**: The `gh` CLI sometimes fails to auto-detect
`GH_TOKEN` in the environment, causing `gh pr view` and `gh pr diff` to
fail with "Bad credentials". Added explicit `gh auth login --with-token`
in both the batch-suggestions and cherry-pick-suggestions jobs.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
- Update hosted model and context-window tables in docs/src/ai/models.md
to remove retired models and list current replacements.
- Add a dated Recent Model Retirements section mapping each retired
model to its replacement.
- Update AI docs examples and references in agent-settings.md,
inline-assistant.md, agent-panel.md, and llm-providers.md to use current
model names.
- Remove stale OpenAI model references in llm-providers.md that no
longer align with currently offered hosted models.
## Validation
- ./script/prettier
- ./script/check-todos
## Suggested .rules additions
- N/A
Release Notes:
- N/A
Adds scripts and a GitHub Action workflow for automatically suggesting
documentation updates when PRs modify user-facing code.
## Scripts
- **`script/docs-suggest`**: Analyze PRs/commits for documentation needs
using AI
- **`script/docs-suggest-publish`**: Create a PR from batched
suggestions
- **`script/docs-strip-preview-callouts`**: Remove Preview callouts when
shipping to stable
- **`script/test-docs-suggest-batch`**: Testing utility for batch
analysis
## Workflow
The GitHub Action (`.github/workflows/docs_suggestions.yml`) handles two
scenarios:
1. **PRs merged to main**: Suggestions are batched to
`docs/suggestions-pending` branch for the next Preview release
2. **Cherry-picks to release branches**: Suggestions are posted as PR
comments for immediate review
## Callout Types
The system distinguishes between:
- **Additive features** (new commands, settings, UI):
```markdown
> **Preview:** This feature is available in Zed Preview. It will be
included in the next Stable release.
```
- **Behavior modifications** (changed defaults, altered existing
behavior):
```markdown
> **Changed in Preview (v0.XXX).** See [release notes](/releases#0.XXX).
```
Both callout types are stripped by `docs-strip-preview-callouts` when
features ship to stable.
## Example Output
See PR #49190 for example documentation suggestions generated by running
this on PRs from the v0.224 preview window.
## Usage
```bash
# Analyze a PR (auto-detects batch vs immediate mode)
script/docs-suggest --pr 49100
# Dry run to see assembled context
script/docs-suggest --pr 49100 --dry-run
# Create PR from batched suggestions
script/docs-suggest-publish
# Strip callouts for stable release
script/docs-strip-preview-callouts
```
Release Notes:
- N/A
This removes trailing whitespace when getting the current version of the
extension, as we ran into some cases where a `\r` was added to that for
some reason.
Release Notes:
- N/A
We need more fetch depth here for the check, hence bumping this.
Also does a drive-by cleanup of the checkout step within xtask to make
this (hopefully) more intuitive to use.
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
- refresh git auth headers before each per-crash iteration in
`background_agent_mvp`
- add guarded `git fetch`/`git checkout` handling so one candidate auth
failure doesn’t fail the entire run
## Context
- fixes the auth failure seen in workflow run 22106378719 (`fatal: could
not read Username for 'https://github.com'`)
- related Linear issue: BIZOPS-853
## Testing
- ruby -e "require 'yaml';
YAML.load_file('.github/workflows/background_agent_mvp.yml')"
Release Notes:
- N/A
## Summary
- add a new crash issue-linking subagent prompt
(`.factory/prompts/crash/link-issues.md`)
- add a scheduled/manual GitHub workflow for week-one background-agent
runs (`.github/workflows/background_agent_mvp.yml`)
- add Sentry candidate selection script to rank top crashes by
solvability × population (`script/select-sentry-crash-candidates`)
- add a local dry-run runner for end-to-end MVP execution without
push/PR actions (`script/run-background-agent-mvp-local`)
## Guardrails in this MVP
- draft PRs only (no auto-merge)
- reviewer routing defaults to: `eholk,morgankrey,osiewicz,bennetbo`
- pipeline order is: investigate -> link-issues -> fix
## Validation
- `python3 -m py_compile script/select-sentry-crash-candidates
script/run-background-agent-mvp-local`
- `python3 script/select-sentry-crash-candidates --help`
- `python3 script/run-background-agent-mvp-local --help`
---------
Co-authored-by: John D. Swanson <swannysec@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes the two remaining steps in the Collab deployment
workflow to Namespace runners.
The previous `runs-on` labels were no longer functional.
Release Notes:
- N/A
While the 60 days of inactivity works for a lot of the issues, with
other (more stubborn and popular) bugs it's too noisy to nag people
every eight weeks.
Also changing days-before-close after seeing a few cases of people
getting back to us after more than two weeks since the bot's question.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Although this introduces a small possiblity that we will regress the nix
build,
the existing check is very slow and fails very rarely.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Reverts zed-industries/zed#48607
The problem we've ran into is that CI started reusing already-cached
runs from newer branches (that did not have that change pulled in).
Yet this unveiled another potential issue, which is that relying on
mtime might make it so that an artifact for a different (newer) commit
would be reused by an unrelated run of CI.
The answer is: checksum-based-freshness.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This fixes another issue for the ruby extension where a cargo index
update can sometimes take quite some time. However, this will not change
anything for all other extensions, as they continue to bump within the
defined timeout.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the names for the PRs to roll out to the extensions, as
having the `zed@` prefix does not look too pretty.
It also increases the concurrency of matrix jobs run to 10, as the
rollout has matured by now and is safe to perform for more repositories
at once.
Release Notes:
- N/A
