* docs(pr): require user-perspective description and surface area The previous template asked for Summary + Validation, which encouraged code-perspective descriptions and let user-visible surface changes slip past review unnoticed. Replace with: - "Problem" — issue link + motivation - "What users will see" — first-person user-visible effect - "Surface area" — 9-item checklist (UI, shortcut, CLI/env, API/contract, extension point, i18n, top-level dependency, default behavior change, none) - "Screenshots" — required when UI surface is checked, focused on the entry point users discover rather than the feature in isolation - "Validation" — kept, retitled away from "Summary" Authoritative rules added to AGENTS.md under a new "Pull request expectations" section so external contributors' agents (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) pick up the requirement when reading the repo. CONTRIBUTING.md gets one pointer line in "Commits & pull requests"; localized CONTRIBUTING variants (zh-CN, de, fr, ja-JP, pt-BR) are left for follow-up translation PRs per the existing docs-update workflow. The existing "Fixes #" prompt is preserved verbatim — that template addition from #1263 enforces PR-to-issue auto-linking and stays load-bearing. * docs(pr): broaden dependency surface to dev deps as well The "New top-level dependency" checkbox narrowed scope to runtime deps, but CONTRIBUTING.md L239 says "No new top-level dependencies" without limiting to runtime, and the AGENTS.md rule uses the same broad phrase. A new devDependency (tool/test/build package) belongs in the same bytes-vs-benefit explanation, so the checklist item should match. * docs(pr): add Why and Bug fix verification; scope deps to root package.json Three follow-up tweaks from review feedback: 1. Rename `## Problem` to `## Why` with a broader prompt that asks contributors to cover both their own use case (what made them write this PR today) and the pain being addressed. The old "Problem" framing only covered user-facing motivations and left no slot for the contributor's stake — a key signal for triaging external PRs. 2. New `## Bug fix verification` section between Screenshots and Validation, conditional on the PR being a bug fix. Surfaces the AGENTS.md "Bug follow-up workflow" red-spec requirement at PR-authoring time instead of leaving it implicit; asks for the test path and the red-on-main / green-on-branch confirmation. 3. Clarify the "New top-level dependency" checkbox to specify the **root** `package.json`. Without that word, contributors in a monorepo could read the check as applying to any workspace `package.json` (e.g. adding `react` to `apps/web/package.json` would be in scope) when CONTRIBUTING.md L239's "small on purpose" rule clearly meant root-level deps only. AGENTS.md `## Pull request expectations` and CONTRIBUTING.md's pointer line are updated to match the new section names and add the bug-fix red-spec expectation.
16 KiB
Contributing to Open Design
Thanks for thinking about contributing. OD is small on purpose — most of the value lives in files (skills, design systems, prompt fragments) rather than framework code. That means the highest-leverage contributions are usually one folder, one Markdown file, or one PR-sized adapter.
This guide tells you exactly where to look for each type of contribution and what bar a PR has to clear before we merge it.
English · Português (Brasil) · Deutsch · Français · 简体中文 · 日本語
Three things you can ship in one afternoon
| If you want to… | You're really adding | Where it lives | Ship size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make OD render a new kind of artifact (an invoice, an iOS Settings screen, a one-pager…) | a Skill | skills/<your-skill>/ |
one folder, ~2 files |
| Make OD speak a new brand's visual language | a Design System | design-systems/<brand>/DESIGN.md |
one Markdown file |
| Hook up a new coding-agent CLI | an Agent adapter | apps/daemon/src/agents.ts |
~10 lines in one array |
Add a feature, fix a bug, lift a UX pattern from open-codesign |
code | apps/web/src/, apps/daemon/ |
normal PR |
| Improve docs, port a section to Français / Deutsch / 中文, fix typos | docs | README.md, README.fr.md, README.de.md, README.zh-CN.md, docs/, QUICKSTART.md |
one PR |
If you're not sure which bucket your idea is in, open a discussion / issue first and we'll point you at the right surface.
Local setup
The full one-page setup lives in QUICKSTART.md. The TL;DR for contributors:
git clone https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design.git
cd open-design
corepack enable # selects the pinned pnpm from packageManager
pnpm install
pnpm tools-dev run web # daemon + web foreground loop
pnpm typecheck # tsc -b --noEmit
pnpm --filter @open-design/web build # web package build when needed
Node ~24 and pnpm 10.33.x are required. nvm / fnm are optional; use nvm install 24 && nvm use 24 or fnm install 24 && fnm use 24 if you prefer managing Node that way. macOS, Linux, and WSL2 are the primary paths. Windows native is supported; see docs/windows-troubleshooting.md for the common setup gotchas.
Docker Setup
Run Open Design without installing Node.js or pnpm.
Prerequisites
Make sure Docker Desktop with Compose v2 is installed:
docker compose version
Start Open Design
cd deploy
docker compose up -d
Open in your browser:
http://localhost:7456
Common Commands
# View logs
docker compose logs -f
# Restart containers
docker compose restart
# Stop containers
docker compose down
# Pull latest image
docker compose pull
docker compose up -d
Optional Environment Overrides
Create a deploy/.env file:
OPEN_DESIGN_PORT=7456
OPEN_DESIGN_MEM_LIMIT=384m
OPEN_DESIGN_ALLOWED_ORIGINS=https://yourdomain.com
OPEN_DESIGN_IMAGE=docker.io/vanjayak/open-design:latest
Projects and database data are persisted automatically using Docker volumes.
For the full Docker guide and advanced configuration, see QUICKSTART.md.
Adding a new Skill
A skill is a folder under skills/ with a SKILL.md at the root, following Claude Code's SKILL.md convention plus our optional od: extension. No registration step. Drop the folder in, restart the daemon, the picker shows it.
→ See docs/skills-contributing.md for the full guide
That file walks through:
- Quick start — clone → copy a closest existing skill → run
pnpm tools-dev run web→ see the picker → open PR. - What a skill IS / IS NOT — saves you a week if your idea turns out to be a feature or vendor integration in disguise.
- Skill anatomy — minimum folder layout and
SKILL.mdfrontmatter cheat sheet. - Running locally — the four commands that actually matter.
- Merge bar — copy-pasteable checklist of every thing a reviewer will check.
- PR description template — drop into your PR body and fill in.
- Common rejection patterns — the close reasons we've used recently, with concrete examples.
The protocol spec (full frontmatter grammar — typed inputs, slider parameters, craft references, testing primitives) lives separately in docs/skills-protocol.md.
Adding a new Design System
A design system is a single DESIGN.md file under design-systems/<slug>/. One file, no code. Drop it in, restart the daemon, the picker shows it grouped by category.
Design system folder layout
design-systems/your-brand/
└── DESIGN.md
DESIGN.md shape
# Design System Inspired by YourBrand
> Category: Developer Tools
> One-line summary that shows in the picker preview.
## 1. Visual Theme & Atmosphere
…
## 2. Color
- Primary: `#hex` / `oklch(...)`
- …
## 3. Typography
…
## 4. Spacing & Grid
## 5. Layout & Composition
## 6. Components
## 7. Motion & Interaction
## 8. Voice & Brand
## 9. Anti-patterns
The 9-section schema is fixed — that's what skill bodies grep for. The first H1 becomes the picker label (the Design System Inspired by prefix is stripped automatically), and the > Category: … line decides which group it lands in. Existing categories are listed in design-systems/README.md; if your brand truly doesn't fit, you can introduce a new one, but try existing categories first.
Bar for merging a new design system
- All 9 sections present. Empty section bodies are fine for hard-to-find data (e.g. motion tokens), but the headings have to be there or the prompt grep breaks.
- Hex codes are real. Sample directly from the brand's site or product, not from memory or AI guesses. The README's "brand-spec extraction" 5-step protocol applies to maintainers too.
- OKLch values for accent colors are nice-to-have. They make palettes lerp predictably across light/dark.
- No marketing fluff. The brand's tagline is not a design token. Cut it.
- Slug uses ASCII —
linear.appbecomeslinear-app,x.aibecomesx-ai. The 69 imported systems already follow this convention; mirror it.
The 69 product systems we ship are imported from VoltAgent/awesome-design-md via scripts/sync-design-systems.ts. If your brand belongs upstream, send the PR there first — we'll pick it up automatically on the next sync. The design-systems/ folder is for systems that don't fit upstream, plus our two hand-authored starters.
Adding a new coding-agent CLI
Hooking up a new agent (e.g. some new shop's foo-coder CLI) is one entry in apps/daemon/src/agents.ts:
{
id: 'foo',
name: 'Foo Coder',
bin: 'foo',
versionArgs: ['--version'],
buildArgs: (prompt) => ['exec', '-p', prompt],
streamFormat: 'plain', // or 'claude-stream-json' if it speaks that
}
That's it — daemon will detect it on PATH, the picker shows it, the chat path works. If the CLI emits typed events (like Claude Code's --output-format stream-json), wire a parser in apps/daemon/src/claude-stream.ts and set streamFormat: 'claude-stream-json'.
Bar for merging:
- A real session works end-to-end with the new agent — paste the daemon log into the PR description showing it streamed an artifact through.
docs/agent-adapters.mdis updated with the CLI's quirks (does it require a key file? does it support image input? what's its non-interactive flag?).- The README's "Supported coding agents" table gets one row.
Updating model max_tokens metadata
API-mode chat sends max_tokens to the upstream provider on every request. The web client picks that number from a three-tier lookup in apps/web/src/state/maxTokens.ts:
- The user's explicit override in Settings, if set.
- Otherwise, the per-model default in
apps/web/src/state/litellm-models.json— a vendored slice of BerriAI/litellm'smodel_prices_and_context_window.json(MIT). It covers ~2k chat models across Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepSeek, Groq, Together, Mistral, Gemini, Bedrock, Vertex, OpenRouter, and friends. - Otherwise,
FALLBACK_MAX_TOKENS = 8192.
To pick up a newly-launched model, regenerate the vendored JSON:
node --experimental-strip-types scripts/sync-litellm-models.ts
The script fetches LiteLLM's catalog, filters to mode: 'chat' entries, projects each to its max_output_tokens (or max_tokens fallback), and writes a sorted snapshot. Commit the regenerated litellm-models.json alongside whatever PR triggered the refresh.
The OVERRIDES table in maxTokens.ts is for the rare case where LiteLLM is missing or wrong for a model id we actually use — for example, mimo-v2.5-pro (LiteLLM only ships MiMo via the openrouter/xiaomi/... and novita/xiaomimimo/... aliases, neither of which matches the canonical id Xiaomi's direct API uses). Keep it small; everything that LiteLLM gets right belongs upstream.
Localization maintenance
German uses formal Sie because OD speaks to a mixed audience of solo creators, agencies, and engineering teams; until project feedback shows that an informal du voice fits better, formal German is the least surprising default. Locale PRs should translate UI chrome, core docs, and display-only gallery metadata in apps/web/src/i18n/content.ts, but should not translate skills/, design-systems/, or prompt bodies that agents execute. Those source prompts are maintained as workflow inputs, and keeping one source language avoids multiplying prompt QA across locales. When adding or renaming a skill, design system, or prompt template, update the German display metadata and run pnpm --filter @open-design/web test; content.test.ts fails if German display coverage drifts. Daemon errors, export filenames, and agent-generated artifact text are known limitations unless a PR explicitly scopes them.
For step-by-step instructions on adding a new locale (UI dictionary, README, language switcher, regional terminology), see TRANSLATIONS.md.
Code style
We're not pedantic about formatting (Prettier on save is fine), but two rules are non-negotiable because they show up in the prompt stack and the user-facing API:
- Single quotes in JS/TS. Strings are single-quoted unless escaping makes them ugly. The codebase is already consistent — please match.
- Comments in English. Even if the PR is translating something into Deutsch or 中文, code comments stay in English so we can keep one set of greppable references.
Beyond that:
- Don't narrate. No
// import the module, no// loop through items. If the code reads obviously, the comment is noise. Save comments for non-obvious intent or constraints the code can't express. - TypeScript for
apps/web/src/. The daemon (apps/daemon/) is plain ESM JavaScript with JSDoc when types matter — keep it that way. - No new top-level dependencies without a paragraph in the PR description on what we get vs. what bytes we ship. The dep list in
package.jsonis small on purpose. - Run
pnpm typecheckbefore pushing. CI runs it; failing it earns a "please fix" comment.
Commits & pull requests
- One concern per PR. Adding a skill + refactoring the parser + bumping a dep is three PRs.
- Title is imperative + scope.
add dating-web skill,fix daemon SSE backpressure when CLI hangs,docs: clarify .od layout. - Use the PR template. Fill every section of
.github/pull_request_template.md— Why, What users will see, Surface area, Screenshots (if UI), Bug fix verification (if bug fix), Validation. Empty sections earn a "please fill in" reply. - Body explains the why. "What does this do" is usually obvious from the diff; "why does this need to exist" rarely is.
- Reference an issue if there is one. If there isn't and the PR is non-trivial, open one first so we can agree the change is wanted before you spend the time.
- No squash-during-review. Push fixups; we'll squash on merge.
- No force-push to a shared branch unless the reviewer asked.
We don't enforce a CLA. Apache-2.0 covers us; your contribution is licensed under the same.
Reporting bugs
Open an issue with:
- What you ran (the exact
pnpm tools-dev ...invocation). - Which agent CLI was selected (or whether you were on the BYOK path).
- The skill + design system pair that triggered it.
- The relevant daemon stderr tail — most "the artifact never rendered" reports get diagnosed in 30 seconds when we can see
spawn ENOENTor the CLI's actual error. - A screenshot if it's UI.
For prompt-stack bugs ("the agent emitted a purple gradient hero, the slop blacklist was supposed to forbid that"), include the full assistant message so we can see whether the violation was the model or the prompt.
Asking questions
- Architecture question, design question, "is this a bug or a misuse" → GitHub Discussions (preferred — searchable for the next person).
- "How do I write a skill that does X" → Open a discussion. We'll answer it and turn the answer into
docs/skills-protocol.mdif it's a missing pattern.
What we don't accept
To keep the project focused, please don't open PRs that:
- Vendor a model runtime. OD's whole bet is "your existing CLI is enough". We don't ship
pi-ai, OpenAI keys, or model loaders. - Rewrite the frontend away from the current stack without prior discussion. Next.js 16 App Router + React 18 + TS is the line. No Astro, Solid, Svelte, or other framework rewrites unless maintainers explicitly want that migration.
- Replace the daemon with a serverless function. The daemon's whole point is owning a real
cwdand spawning a real CLI. Vercel deployment of the SPA is fine; the daemon stays a daemon. - Add telemetry / analytics / phone-home. OD is local-first. The only outbound calls are to providers the user explicitly configured.
- Bundle a binary without a license file and authorship attribution next to it.
If you're not sure whether your idea fits, open a discussion before writing the code.
Becoming a Maintainer
If you've been contributing consistently and want to know what the path to becoming a Maintainer looks like, the rules live in MAINTAINERS.md. The short version:
- A Maintainer can review, approve, and close issues. The merge button stays with the Core Team — your approval still counts as the required approval for merge.
- The bar is ≥ 20 merged PRs plus a published account-quality check (anti-bot, anti-sock-puppet) plus a Core Team judgment on contribution quality. There is no application form; the Core Team raises candidates internally and reaches out.
- There are no quotas, no SLAs, and no fixed term. Stepping down is easy and reversible (Emeritus → return when life calms down).
- All the thresholds, the nomination flow, the step-down rules, and the early-project waiver are in
MAINTAINERS.md. Read that document if any of the above interests you.
The tl;dr: ship good PRs, review thoughtfully, hang out in Discussions / Discord, and the rest takes care of itself.
License
By contributing, you agree your contribution is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License of this repository, with the exception of files inside skills/guizang-ppt/, which retain their original MIT license and authorship attribution to op7418.