Keep
+Editorial hierarchy, warm off-white surface, restrained accent, quiet interaction states, and roomy note-taking density.
+diff --git a/skills/reference-design-contract/SKILL.md b/skills/reference-design-contract/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ca87f70c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/reference-design-contract/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +--- +name: reference-design-contract +zh_name: "参考转设计合约" +en_name: "Reference Design Contract" +description: | + Turn vague taste, screenshots, URLs, product notes, or "make it feel like this" + references into a grounded DESIGN.md plus an implementation handoff. Use it + before prototypes, decks, redesigns, or image remix work when the user needs + a reusable visual direction rather than a one-off prompt. +triggers: + - "design contract" + - "reference design brief" + - "style contract" + - "visual direction handoff" + - "turn references into DESIGN.md" + - "make it feel like this" + - "做同款但不照抄" + - "把参考图转成设计规范" +od: + mode: design-system + platform: desktop + scenario: planning + category: design-systems + preview: + type: html + entry: example.html + design_system: + requires: false + generates: true + sections: [visual-theme, color, typography, spacing, layout, components, motion, voice, anti-patterns] + craft: + requires: + - typography + - color + - anti-ai-slop + inputs: + - name: brief + type: string + required: true + description: "Goal, audience, references, or the style problem to resolve" + outputs: + primary: DESIGN.md + secondary: + - design-contract.md + - implementation-handoff.md + - example.html + capabilities_required: + - file_write + example_prompt: "Create a reference design contract for a developer-notes app. The direction should feel editorial, calm, tactile, and serious, but not copy any specific product. Produce DESIGN.md and an implementation handoff." + example_prompt_i18n: + zh-CN: "为一个开发者笔记应用创建「参考转设计合约」。方向要有编辑感、安静、触感强、认真,但不要照抄任何具体产品。输出 DESIGN.md 和实现交接说明。" +--- + +# Reference Design Contract + +Use this skill when the user has taste signals, references, or a rough "like +this" request and needs a reusable design contract before generation. The goal +is not to write a longer prompt. The goal is to make design decisions explicit +enough that a later prototype, deck, redesign, or image-remix run can execute +without guessing. + +## What this skill produces + +Create three files: + +1. `DESIGN.md` — the reusable visual direction, following Open Design's + standard nine-section design-system shape. +2. `design-contract.md` — the decision record: evidence used, keep/change + boundaries, rationale, risks, and quality gate. +3. `implementation-handoff.md` — concise build instructions for the next + artifact-producing skill or coding agent. + +If a preview is useful, also create `example.html` as a small hand-built +contract preview. Do not make it the main deliverable. + +## Workflow + +1. **Lock the job.** Identify target artifact type, audience, brand/product + context, references, and constraints. Ask at most two questions only when a + missing answer would change the direction. Otherwise choose a sensible + default and label it as inferred. +2. **Read evidence.** Use provided screenshots, URLs, existing `DESIGN.md`, + brand docs, image artifacts, or user notes. If evidence is missing, say so + and base the contract on the brief only; do not invent brand facts. +3. **Separate reference semantics.** For every reference, split it into: + - `Keep`: qualities to preserve, such as density, composition, material, + typography rhythm, color temperature, or motion attitude. + - `Change`: subject matter, copy, brand marks, exact layout, protected + assets, and anything the user wants adapted. + - `Do not copy`: literal screenshots, logos, claims, pricing, proprietary + UI, or exact prompt wording from examples. +4. **Freeze the direction.** Choose one coherent visual stance. Do not provide + five unrelated moodboards. If there are genuinely competing directions, + name them briefly, pick the recommended one, and continue. +5. **Write `DESIGN.md`.** Use these nine headings exactly: + - `## 1. Visual Theme & Atmosphere` + - `## 2. Color` + - `## 3. Typography` + - `## 4. Spacing & Grid` + - `## 5. Layout & Composition` + - `## 6. Components` + - `## 7. Motion & Interaction` + - `## 8. Voice & Brand` + - `## 9. Anti-patterns` +6. **Write `design-contract.md`.** Include: + - goal and target artifact + - evidence table with confidence (`observed`, `provided`, `inferred`) + - keep/change/do-not-copy table + - final design stance in one paragraph + - risks and explicit unknowns + - quality gate checklist +7. **Write `implementation-handoff.md`.** Keep it short and operational: + - files to read + - token/palette/type/layout constraints + - asset rules + - responsive requirements + - "first artifact should prove..." acceptance notes +8. **Validate.** Read `references/checklist.md` and satisfy every P0 gate + before final handoff. + +## Output rules + +- Make every claim traceable to user input, observed reference evidence, or an + explicitly labeled inference. +- Prefer concrete constraints over adjectives: "one warm accent, no purple or + blue glow" beats "premium". +- Treat "do the same style" as "borrow controllable qualities", not "clone the + original subject or prompt". +- If the user asks for immediate UI generation too, finish these contract files + first, then hand off to the appropriate artifact skill in the next step. diff --git a/skills/reference-design-contract/example.html b/skills/reference-design-contract/example.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0779774ac --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/reference-design-contract/example.html @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ + + +
+ + +Reference Design Contract
+This sample shows the shape of the contract: evidence first, then boundaries, then a handoff a second agent can execute without cloning the reference.
+Editorial hierarchy, warm off-white surface, restrained accent, quiet interaction states, and roomy note-taking density.
+Replace any reference brand marks, subject matter, pricing, copy, and exact layout with the user's own product context.
+No literal screenshot recreation, no proprietary UI details, no borrowed claims, no prompt-template subject copied as the final subject.
+